Hwiwon Wi vs Jemma Carbis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Mar at 12:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Wi vs J. Carbis

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Wi 1 - 0 Carbis
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hwiwon Wi winning 2 and Jemma Carbis winning 0. The last match between Hwiwon Wi and Jemma Carbis was at the W35 Swan Hill, 18-03-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Grass, with Hwiwon Wi getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wi | 1 |
| Carbis | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Swan Hill(03-18-25)
H. Wi vs J. Carbis H2H Profile
H. Wi vs J. Carbis Match Preview:
Recent performance statistics reveal that Wi has outperformed Carbis in several key areas over the past six months. Wi has shown superior capability in second serve situations, securing 38.67% of points compared to Carbis's 33.33%. This particular statistic has a strong correlation with match outcome forecasts.
In terms of returning serves, Wi has consistently excelled, having won 50% of points against opponent's second serves, whereas Carbis has managed 33.33%. For first serve returns, Wi again leads with 38.59% over Carbis's 32.26%. Evaluating the players' ability to handle pressure, Wi has successfully saved 47.37% of breakpoints, outperforming Carbis who has saved 37.5%.
Comparing overall performance over the past year, Wi has achieved a win percentage of 52.94% with a record of 18 wins and 16 losses, while Carbis has only accomplished a 33.33% win rate with 4 victories and 8 defeats. These performance stats provide a clear overview of the head-to-head assessment.
When looking at surface preference, both players have their best winning percentages on Grass. Wi boasts an 80% win rate on this surface (4-1), whereas Carbis holds a 55% win rate (6-5). However, Wi struggles on Indoor Hard courts, with only 20% win success, as does Carbis on Hard with a 21% win rate. In terms of event level comparison, Wi has participated mainly in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, securing a 57.14% success rate, distinctly higher than Carbis's 25% win rate in similar events.
The quality of opponents faced also differentiates the two, with Wi facing competitors with an average rank of 314.71, compared to Carbis’s average opponent rank of 225.42. Wi's performance in deciding sets has been stronger with a 45% win rate over the past year, while Carbis has managed only 33%. Additionally, Wi demonstrates a better break point conversion rate, converting 44.26% of opportunities, significantly higher than Carbis's 25%.
Considering these comprehensive statistics, Wi is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match. The player's superior past performance, effective serve returns, breakpoint management, and favorable head-to-head stats provide a solid foundation for a win prediction.
Hwiwon Wi vs Jemma Carbis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Wi vs J. Carbis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:5:50 | Average Match Time | 1:5:50 |
| 93% (27/29) | 1st Serve % | 72% (36/50) |
| 85% (23/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (15/36) |
| 50% (1/2) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (4/14) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (31/50) | Return Points Win % | 17% (5/29) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Wi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 4-6 6-2 11-9 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 2-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
J. Carbis Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-0 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-4 0-6 11-9 | ||

H. Wi vs J. Carbis Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.17% (79/85) | YTD Win/Loss | 30.77% (12/27) |
| 48.76% (177/186) | Sets Win/Loss | 34.88% (30/56) |
| 49.24% (1619/1669) | Games Win/Loss | 42.91% (339/451) |
| 47.89% (68/74) | Hard Win/Loss | 22.22% (6/21) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 71.43% (5/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (6/6) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 17 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 310 | Total Double Faults | 64 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 380.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 306.64 |
| 69% (4469/6493) | 1st Serve % | 67% (688/1024) |
| 53% (2356/4469) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (365/688) |
| 42% (855/2024) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (133/336) |
| 50% (399/797) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (30/76) |
| 47% (2934/6233) | Return Points Win % | 36% (326/906) |
| 52.54% (31/28) | Challenger W/L | 29.41% (10/24) |
| 45.71% (48/57) | Futures W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 48% (76/159) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 31% (12/39) |
| 42% (8/19) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 45% (18/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (2/8) |
| 82% (85/70) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (11/10) |
| 18% (85/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (11/1) |
| 10% (79/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (28/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
